The Disabled Solider

張昱
杜杰穎

1. He took suffering from catastrophe easily. He think those who took misfortune easily was a real great.

2. Yes, I do agree. For example, Beethoven lost his hearing and keep doing his job as a composer and got lots of admirations from others.

3. Yes, because they suffered many disasters and wanted to get free. When people stared to show their sympathy to the suffers, they would be more happy.

4. I partially agree. Yes a man may be brave when be looked, but that doesn't mean that the braveness is all from vanity and the disfortune he bear isn't great.

5. Yeah, I agree, because when suffering from misfortune, he still took misfortune easily is not simple. I think the author was enjoying the hardships. I think experiencing something unhappy would make him be positive.

6. Yes, You felt hurt because you felt it. You don't and will never feel the misfortunes from others, thus the misfortunes on you are always more painful than those on the others.

7. because in the final part of the novel, he said “ I enjoy good health, and will for ever love liberty and old England. ” That means he didn’t complain anything about his misfortune.

8.
(1)His father died when he was five.
(2)He had been sending from places to places when he was little.
(3)Lived and worked in the workhouse.
(4)He didn't always have food to eat when after he lost his job in the farm.
(5)He was found guilty to be poor and put in jail after he caught a hare in the justice's land.
(6)He was forced to be in the army.
(7)He was forced to be a sailor.
(8)He had faught with privateers for multiple times and during one fight he lost his fingers and leg.

9. No, I don’t agree, because sometimes you still need to escape from misfortune, and you can’t still live in it. Everyone wants to live in a happy life. You think the misfortune is a happy life, but others don’t think so. You can enjoy the hardship just like philosophy said but you can’t enmeshed in it for too long time.

10. This story is criticizing the old misfortune stories, but I think that is only because at then, the languages of word only serve the nobles, so they were just written the misfortunes they thought they were. Nothing to be angry about.